The Effect of Digital Problem Solving Therapy on Quality of Life in Pregnant Women Who Are Victims of Domestic Violence

Authors

  • Dian Priharja Putri Department of midwifery, STIKes Abdi Nusantara, Jakarta
  • Linlin Lindayani STIKep PPNI Jawa Barat
  • Astri Mutiar STIKep PPNI Jawa Barat
  • Irma Darmawati Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33755/jkk.v10i5.758

Keywords:

digital, problem solving therapy, quality of life, pregnant, domestic violence

Abstract

Aim: This study aims to determine the effect of digital problem-solving therapy (DPST) on the quality of life (QOL) of pregnant women who are victims of domestic violence.

Methods: The research was conducted using a quasi-experimental design with two groups: an intervention group receiving digital problem-solving therapy and a control group receiving standard care. The study took place over three months at the National Commission on Violence Against Women service centers and referral hospitals in Bekasi City, West Java. The intervention involved four sessions per month focusing on psychological well-being and QOL. A total of 100 pregnant women participated, meeting the criteria of being over three months pregnant, having experienced domestic violence, owning a smartphone, and living with their husbands.

Results: The results showed a statistically significant increase in QOL scores within the intervention group after the therapy, with a t-score of 13.76 and a p-value of 0.001. Additionally, the intervention group exhibited a larger improvement in QOL at post-test compared to the control group (ß = 8.20, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Digital problem-solving therapy significantly improves the quality of life of pregnant women experiencing domestic violence. Future studies should explore the effectiveness of this intervention among more diverse research groups, focusing on participants with varied mental health and psychological characteristics.

References

[Understanding and addressing violence against women : Intimate partner violence [Internet]. World Health Organization; 1970 [cited 2024 Mar 21]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/77432

Violence against women prevalence estimates, 2018: Global, regional and national prevalence estimates for intimate partner violence against women and global and regional prevalence estimates for non-partner sexual violence against women: Executive summary [Internet]. World Health Organization; 1970 [cited 2024 Mar 21]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/341338

Kwako LE, Glass N, Campbell J, Melvin KC, Barr T, Gill JM. Traumatic brain injury in intimate partner violence: A critical review of outcomes and mechanisms. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2011 Jul 20;12(3):115–26. doi: 10.1177/1524838011404251.

Li Y, Marshall CM, Rees HC, Nunez A, Ezeanolue EE, Ehiri JE. Intimate partner violence and HIV infection among women: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Int AIDS Soc. 2014 Jan 13;17(1). doi: 10.7448/IAS.17.1.18845.

Lagdon S, Armour C, Stringer M. Adult experience of mental health outcomes as a result of intimate partner violence victimisation: A systematic review. Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2014 Dec 1;5(1). doi: 10.3402/ejpt.v5.24794

Carlson J, Voith L, Brown JC, Holmes M. Viewing children’s exposure to intimate partner violence through a developmental, social-ecological, and survivor lens: the current state of the field, challenges, and future directions. Violence Against Women. 2019 Jan 16;25(1):6–28. doi: 10.1177/1077801218816187.

Kimber M, Adham S, Gill S, McTavish J, MacMillan HL. The association between child exposure to intimate partner violence (IPV) and perpetration of IPV in adulthood—A systematic review. Child Abuse Negl. 2018 Feb;76:273–86. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.11.007.

Chisholm CA, Bullock L, Ferguson JE (Jef). Intimate partner violence and pregnancy: epidemiology and impact. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Aug;217(2):141–4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.05.042.

Pastor-Moreno G, Ruiz-Pérez I, Henares-Montiel J, Petrova D. Intimate partner violence during pregnancy and risk of fetal and neonatal death: a meta-analysis with socioeconomic context indicators. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Feb;222(2):123-133.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.07.045.

Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research (SRH). Global and regional estimates of violence against women. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021. 1–51 p.

Fact Sheet and Key Findings of the Annual National Women's Commission 2019 (Lembar Fakta dan Temuan Kunci Catatan Tahunan Komisi Nasional Perempuan Tahun 2019) [Internet]. Women's National Commission.; 2020 [cited 2024 Mar 21]. Available from: http://ncw.nic.in/reports/annual-reports

Pratiwi NL, Fitrianti Y, Nuraini S, Rachmawati T, Laksono AD. Ibu hamil “kemel” pada Etnis Gayo di Kecamatan Blang Pegayon Kabupaten Gayo Lues, Aceh. Buletin Penelitian Sistem Kesehatan. 2019 Aug 6;22(2):81–90. doi: 10.22435/hsr.v22i2.1693

Megatsari H, Laksono AD, Herwanto YT, Sarweni KP, Geno RAP, Nugraheni E et al. Does husband/partner matter in reduce women’s risk of worries?: study of psychosocial burden of COVID-19 in Indonesia. Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology. 2021 Jan 7; 15(1). doi: 10.37506/ijfmt.v15i1.13564

Laksono AD, Matahari R, Wulandari RD. Factors related to the choice of contraceptive methods among the poor in Indonesia. SRP.2020 March 28]; 11(9): 195-200. doi:10.31838/srp.2020.9.32

Laksono AD, Wulandari RD. Violence against pregnant women in Indonesia. Iran J Public Health. 2022 Jun 15; 51(6):1265-1273. doi:10.18502/ijph.v51i6.9670

Belay S, Astatkie A, Emmelin M, Hinderaker SG. Intimate partner violence and maternal depression during pregnancy: A community-based cross-sectional study in Ethiopia. PLoS One. 2019 Jul 31;14(7):e0220003. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220003

Waddell N, Karatzias T. The relationship between interpersonal trauma and substance misuse in pregnancy. Br J Midwifery. 2019 Sep 2;27(9):578–88. doi: 10.12968/bjom.2019.27.9.578

Koch AR, Rosenberg D, Geller SE. Higher risk of homicide among pregnant and postpartum females aged 10–29 years in Illinois, 2002–2011. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2016 Sep;128(3):440–6. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001559.

Meh C, Thind A, Terry AL. Ratios and determinants of maternal mortality: A comparison of geographic differences in the northern and southern regions of Cameroon. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Dec 31;20(1):194. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-02879-y.

Maddoux J, Symes L, McFarlane J, Koci A, Gilroy H, Fredland N. Problem-solving and mental health outcomes of women and children in the wake of intimate partner violence. J Environ Public Health. 2014;2014:1–7. doi: 10.1155/2014/708198

16. Trabold N, McMahon J, Alsobrooks S, Whitney S, Mittal M. A systematic review of intimate partner violence interventions: state of the field and implications for practitioners. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2020 Apr 12;21(2):311–25. doi: 10.1177/1524838018767934

Garcia-Moreno C, Jansen HA, Ellsberg M, Heise L, Watts CH. Prevalence of intimate partner violence: findings from the WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence. The Lancet. 2006 Oct;368(9543):1260–9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69523-8.]

Additional Files

Published

2024-10-31

How to Cite

Putri, D. P. ., Lindayani, L. ., Mutiar, A. ., & Darmawati, I. . (2024). The Effect of Digital Problem Solving Therapy on Quality of Life in Pregnant Women Who Are Victims of Domestic Violence. Jurnal Keperawatan Komprehensif (Comprehensive Nursing Journal), 10(5), 681–688. https://doi.org/10.33755/jkk.v10i5.758