Application of “SISBAR” for effective communication between nurses and doctors at private hospital in Indonesia.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33755/jkk.v7iSpecial%20Edition.258Keywords:
Communication, SISBAR, Effectif, Nurses, DoctorsAbstract
Aims : Effective communication is the main elements of patient safety goals because communication is the first cause of patient safety problems. Effective communication must be built on aspects of clarity, accuracy, in accordance with the context of language and information, systematic flow, and culture. This study looks at whether there is an effect of SISBAR communication than SBAR on effective communication between nurses and doctors during consultations or handovers
Design : Observational study to 20 nurses as Nurse incharge at Ruby Barat and Timur in SHBC (Santosa Hospital Bandung Central), with Observational Chart of SISBAR in 1 month observation.
Methods : This research method uses a quasi-experimental pre and post by using an observational study. The statistical analysis test using the Wilcoxon non-parametric test.
Results : The results of the statistical analysis test using the Wilcoxon non-parametric test obtained p-Value: 0.002 (< 0.05), meaning that there was an significant effect of SISBAR communication on effective communication than SBAR between nurses and doctors in SHBC Bandung.
Conclusions : The results of this study indicate that SISBAR communication is more effective to be applied than SBAR. In SBAR even though there is an element of the introduction, but because it is not mentioned in the abbreviation, nurses often forget about the introduction (aspects of introducing themselves and who is speaking). Therefore, SISBAR can be an alternative in handover communication between nurses and doctors in hospitals. SISBAR communication with the development of SBAR, ISBAR to SISBAR can be developed in others hospitals and in Indonesia generally
References
Riesenberg H, Lübbe AS. In-patient rehabilitation of lung cancer patients�a prospective study. Support Care Cancer. 2010;18(7):877–82.
Aldrich R, Duggan A, Lane K, Nair K, Hill K. ISBAR revisited : Identifying and Solving BARriers to effective clinical handover in inter-hospital transfer : Final Project Report on Pilot Study. Newcastle Hunt New Engl Heal. 2009;
Ramasubbu B, Stewart E, Spiritoso R. Introduction of the identification, situation, background, assessment, recommendations tool to improve the quality of information transfer during medical handover in intensive care. J Intensive Care Soc [Internet]. 2017/02/01. 2017 Feb;18(1):17–23. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28979532
Badrujamaludin A, Kumala TF. Penerapan Introduction, Situation, Background, Assessment and Recommendation (ISBAR) untuk komunikasi efektif antara perawat dan dokter di Rumah Sakit Umum Daerah Cibabat Kota Cimahi. Holistik J Kesehat. 2020;13(4):306–17.
Warashati D, Novieastari E, Afriani T, others. Optimalisasi Peran dan Fungsi Kepala Ruangan dalam Pelaksanaan Sosialisasi Regulasi dan Standar Prosedur Operasional Keselamatan Pasien. J Keperawatan Komprehensif (Comprehensive Nurs Journal). 2020;6(2):85–94.
Abdel-Latif A, Bolli R, Tleyjeh IM, Montori VM, Perin EC, Hornung CA, et al. Adult bone marrow--derived cells for cardiac repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(10):989–97.
Aldrich R, Duggan A, Lane K, Nair K, Hill K. ISBAR revisited: identifying and solving barriers to effective clinical handover in inter-hospital transfer--public report on pilot study. Newcastle Hunt New Engl Heal. 2009;
Bost N, Crilly J, Patterson E, Chaboyer W. Clinical handover of patients arriving by ambulance to a hospital emergency department: a qualitative study. Int Emerg Nurs. 2012;20(3):133–41.
Wainwright C, Wright KM. Nursing clinical handover improvement practices among acute inpatients in a tertiary hospital in Sydney: a best practice implementation project. JBI Evid Synth. 2016;14(10):263–75.
Mullany D V, Ziegenfuss M, Goleby MA, Ward HE. Improved hospital mortality with a low MET dose: the importance of a modified early warning score and communication tool. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2016;44(6):734–41.
