Comparison of Reability and Validity Chinese Four-Level and Three-District Triage Standard (CHT) and Australasian Triage Scale (ATS)

Authors

  • Achmad Fauzi
  • Muhammad Afdhol Zulfikri

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33755/jkk.v9iSpecial%20Edition.539

Keywords:

triase CHT; ATS; Triage level ; reability triase; validity triase

Abstract

Aims : The increase in visits to the emergency room resulted in a buildup of patients and affected the services in the room.  The role of the emergency medical team in the initial assessment (triage) is very important to ensure that the right patient is in the right place at the right time and that nothing is missed. Nurses conduct studies and collect data accurately and consistently in 2 ways, namely reliability and validity.

Methods : This type of research is quantitative with a comparative study design. The data collection instrument is primary data using a checklist observation sheet. The analysis used is univariate and bivariate.

Results : Based on the results of the research conducted, it was shown that there were significant differences in the reliability and validity of the Chinese Four-Level and Three-District Triage Standard (CHT) and the Australasian Triage Scale (ATS) in emergency room patients with a p value = 0.000 (p <0.05).

Conclusion : health workers, especially in the emergency room unit, will be able to perform triage quickly and accurately so as to reduce mortality.

References

Chang AM, Cohen DJ, Lin A, Augustine J, Handel DA, Howell E, et al. Hospital strategies for reducing emergency department crowding: a mixed-methods study. Ann Emerg Med. 2018;71(4):497–505.

Chen D, Zhang F, Yu C, Jiao A, Xiang Q, Yu Y, et al. Hourly associations between exposure to ambient particulate matter and emergency department visits in an urban population of Shenzhen, China. Atmos Environ. 2019;209:78–85.

Boyle A, Beniuk K, Higginson I, Atkinson P. Emergency department crowding: time for interventions and policy evaluations. Emerg Med Int. 2012;2012.

Martin A, Davidson CL, Panik A, Buckenmyer C, Delpais P, Ortiz M. An examination of ESI triage scoring accuracy in relationship to ED nursing attitudes and experience. J Emerg Nurs. 2014;40(5):461–8.

Ebrahimi M, Mirhaghi A, Mazlom R, Heydari A, Nassehi A, Jafari M. The role descriptions of triage nurse in emergency department: a Delphi study. Scientifica (Cairo). 2016;2016.

Atmojo JT, Widiyanto A, Yuniarti T. RELIABILITAS SISTEM TRIASE DALAM PELAYANAN GAWAT DARURAT: A REVIEW. Intan Husada: Jurnal Ilmiah Keperawatan. 2019;7(2):23–31.

Widiyanto A, Handayani RT, Mahrifatulhijah M, Atmojo JT, Darmayanti AT. The Canadian Emergency Department Triage & Acuity Scale (CTAS) dan Perubahannya: A REVIEW. Avicenna: Journal of Health Research. 2019;2(2):88–95.

Mishra P, Pandey CM, Singh U, Gupta A, Sahu C, Keshri A. Descriptive statistics and normality tests for statistical data. Ann Card Anaesth. 2019;22(1):67.

Mishra P, Pandey CM, Singh U, Gupta A. Scales of measurement and presentation of statistical data. Ann Card Anaesth. 2018;21(4):419.

Zhu A, Zhang J, Zhang H, Liu X. Comparison of reliability and validity of the Chinese four-level and three-district triage standard and the Australasian triage scale. Emerg Med Int. 2019;2019.

Zhiting G, Jingfen J, Shuihong C, Minfei Y, Yuwei W, Sa W. Reliability and validity of the four-level Chinese emergency triage scale in mainland China: A multicenter assessment. Int J Nurs Stud. 2020;101:103447.

Ng CJ, Chien CY, Seak JCJ, Tsai SL, Weng YM, Chaou CH, et al. Validation of the five-tier Taiwan triage and acuity scale for prehospital use by emergency medical technicians. Emergency Medicine Journal. 2019;36(8):472–8.

Elsayed ZM, El-Zeny AB, Moustafa MS, Ellouly HA. Comparison between Australasian triage scale and emergency severity index. The Egyptian Journal of Surgery. 2020;39(2):455–60.

Zhu A, Zhang J, Zhang H, Liu X. Comparison of reliability and validity of the Chinese four-level and three-district triage standard and the Australasian triage scale. Emerg Med Int. 2019;2019.

Kim JH, Kim JW, Kim SY, Hong DY, Park SO, Baek KJ, et al. Validation of the Korean Triage and Acuity Scale compare to triage by emergency severity index for emergency adult patient: preliminary study in a tertiary hospital emergency medical center. Journal of the Korean Society of Emergency Medicine. 2016;27(5):436–41.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-30

How to Cite

Fauzi, A. ., & Zulfikri, M. A. . (2023). Comparison of Reability and Validity Chinese Four-Level and Three-District Triage Standard (CHT) and Australasian Triage Scale (ATS) . Jurnal Keperawatan Komprehensif (Comprehensive Nursing Journal), 9(SpecialEdition). https://doi.org/10.33755/jkk.v9iSpecial Edition.539