Student Engagement in Online Learning Among Undergraduate Nursing Students

Authors

  • Firman Sugiharto Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Padjadjaran
  • Ryan Hara Permana Fundamental of Nursing Department, Faculty of Nursing Universitas, Bandung, Indonesia
  • Yanti Hermayanti Maternity of Nursing Department, Faculty of Nursing Universitas, Bandung, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33755/jkk.v9i3.509

Keywords:

Nursing Students, Online Learning, Student Engagement

Abstract

Aims: Student engagement (SE) is a significant factor for success in online learning. The low of SE will impact students' academic achievement.

Purpose: This study aimed to describe SE in online learning at the Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Padjadjaran. 

Methods: This study was quantitative descriptive research. The population was undergraduate nursing students (N=862). The sample criteria were that respondents were active students of the Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Padjadjaran for the 2020/2021 period from the Jatinangor and Pangandaran campuses. The sampling technique was total sampling with a response rate of 64,3% (n=554). Data were collected using the Online Community and Student Engagement Scale. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and presented in frequency distribution tables. 

Results: The results showed that more than half of students (52.7%) had a low category of SE, and nearly half (47.3%) have shown a high category of SE in online learning. Students had low levels of Community Building with the Instructor, Community Building with Classmates, and Engagement with Learning (57.4%; 58.3%; and 51.8%, respectively). The SE level that the respondent currently has has the potential to be increased along with the ongoing process during the lecture period.

Conclusion: More than half of students had a low category of SE in online learning this could have a negative impact on student achievement and educational completion rates. Therefore, intense interactions through discussions between students and lecturers, constructive feedback, and motivational support are highly recommended to be provided by the faculty and peers for improving the SE.

Author Biographies

Ryan Hara Permana, Fundamental of Nursing Department, Faculty of Nursing Universitas, Bandung, Indonesia

Ryan Hara Permana is a lecturer in Fundamental of Nursing Department, Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Padjadjaran.

Yanti Hermayanti, Maternity of Nursing Department, Faculty of Nursing Universitas, Bandung, Indonesia

Yanti Hermayanti is a senior lecturer in Maternity of Nursing Department, Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Padjadjaran.

References

Hindu U, Gusti NI, Sugriwa B, Muliani NM. COVID-19 : Perspektif Pendidikan [Internet]. Jakarta; 2020. Available from: https://www. researchgate.net/profile/I_Ketut_Sudarsana2/publication/344436067_COVID-19_Perspektif_Pendidikan/links /5f753796299bf1b53e032656/COVID-19-Perspektif-Pendidikan.pdf

Fanani Q, Jainurakhma J. Kemampuan Penyesuaian Diri Mahasiswa Terhadap Pembelajaran Daring Di Tengah Pandemi Covid-19. J KomtekInfo [Internet]. 2020;7(4): 285–92. Available from: http://lppm. upiyptk.ac.id/ojsupi/index.php/KOMTEKINFO/article/view/1596/380

Pawicara R, Conilie M. Analisis Pembelajaran Daring Terhadap Kejenuhan Belajar Mahasiswa Tadris Biologi. J Pendidik Biol [Internet]. 2020;1(1). Available from: https://alveoli.iain-jember.ac.id/ index.php/alv/article/view/7

Coman C, Țîru LG, Meseșan-Schmitz L, Stanciu C, Bularca MC. Online teaching and learning in higher education during the coronavirus pandemic: Students’ perspective. Sustain. 2020;12(24):1–22.

Dewart G, Corcoran L, Thirsk L, Petrovic K. Nursing education in a pandemic: Academic challenges in response to COVID-19. Nurse Educ Today [Internet]. 2020;92:104471. Available from: https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.nedt.2020.104471

Desai K. COVID-19 and Nursing Students: A Time of Change. Mississippi RN [Internet]. 2020;82(2):14. Available from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=jlh&AN=143655254&site=ehost-live

Appleton JJ, Christenson SL, Kim D, Reschly AL. Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the Student Engagement Instrument. J Sch Psychol. 2006;44(5):427–45.

Young S, Bruce MA. Classroom Community and Student Engagement in Online Courses. Learning [Internet]. 2011;7(2):219–30. Available from: http://jolt.merlot. org/vol7no2/young_0611.htm

West J, Turner W. Enhancing the assessment experience: improving student perceptions, engagement and understanding using online video feedback. Innov Educ Teach Int. 2016;53(4):400–10.

Martin F, Bolliger DU. Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learn J. 2018;22(1):205–22.

Dotterer AM, Lowe K. Classroom Context, School Engagement, and Academic Achievement in Early Adolescence. J Youth Adolesc. 2011;40(12):1649–60.

Hone KS, El Said GR. Exploring the factors affecting MOOC retention: A survey study. Comput Educ [Internet]. 2016;98:157–68. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.016

Mutahi J, Kinai A, Bore N, Diriye A, Weldemariam K. Studying engagement and performance with learning technology in an African classroom. ACM Int Conf Proceeding Ser. 2017;148–52.

Ritonga Doris. A, Sunarno. A CA. Student Engagement Dalam Penerapan E-Learning Pada Pembelajaran Psikologi Olahraga Di Pjkr Fik Universitas Negeri Medan. J Ilmu Keolahragaan. 2019;18(2):135–45.

Hussain M, Zhu W, Zhang W, Abidi SMR. Student Engagement Predictions in an e-Learning System and Their Impact on Student Course Assessment Scores. Comput Intell Neurosci. 2018;2018.

D’Souza MS, Isac C, Venkatesaperumal R, Nairy KS, Amirtharaj A. Exploring nursing student engagement in the learning environment for improved learning outcomes. Clin Nurs Stud. 2013;2(1):1–16.

Hudson K, Carrasco R. Nursing Student Engagement: Taking a Closer Look. Open J Nurs. 2017;07(02):193–201.

Asfari FR. Task Value, Self-Efficacy, Dan Keterlibatan Pembelajaran Online Mahasiswa Fakultas Keperawatan Universitas Padjadjaran. Universitas Padjadjaran; 2020.

Hampton D, Pearce PF. Student Engagement in Online Nursing Courses. Nurse Educ. 2016;41(6):294–8.

Angelino L, Natvig DA. A Conceptual Model for Engagement of the Online Learner. J Educ Online. 2009;

Abidah A, Hidaayatullaah HN, Simamora RM, Fehabutar D, Mutakinati L. The Impact of Covid-19 to Indonesian Education and Its Relation to the Philosophy of “Merdeka Belajar.” Stud Philos Sci Educ. 2020;1(1):38–49.

Lundberg CA, Sheridan D. Benefits of Engagement with Peers, Faculty, and Diversity for Online Learners. Coll Teach. 2015;63(1):8–15.

Alhih M, Ossiannilsson E, Berigel M. Levels of interaction provided by online distance education models. Eurasia J Math Sci Technol Educ. 2017;13(6):2733–48.

Firman F, Rahayu S. Pembelajaran Online di Tengah Pandemi Covid-19. Indones J Educ Sci. 2020;2(2):81–9.

Bolliger DU, Martin F. Instructor and student perceptions of online student engagement strategies. Distance Educ. 2018;39(4):568–83.

Mucundanyi G. College Student Engagement in Online Learning [Internet]. NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY; 2019. Available from: https://pqdtopen.proquest.com/doc/2285295034.html?FMT=ABS

Dixson MD. Creating effective student engagement in online courses: What do students find engaging? J Scholarsh Teach Learn [Internet]. 2010;10(2):1–13. Available from: http://ezproxy.deakin.edu.au/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eue&AN=52225431&site=eds-live&scope=site

Banna J, Grace Lin M-F, Stewart M, Fialkowski MK. Interaction matters: Strategies to promote engaged learning in an online introductory nutrition course. J online Learn Teach [Internet]. 2015;11(2):249–61. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm. nih.gov/pubmed/27441032%0Ahttp://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=PMC4948751

Saadiah H, Wahid A. Are Students Engaging In Online Classrooms? Eur J Educ Stud. 2020;7(2019):202–22.

Neslihan F, Mustafa ER. The effects of student-content interaction on academic performance in distance-learning courses. Int J New Trends Educ their Implic. 2016;7(3):60–8.

Nugent TT. The Impact of Teacher-Student Interaction on Student Motivation and Achievement. Eur Acad Res [Internet]. 2014;7(1):1–5. Available from: https://www. researchgate.net/publication/333843059_The_Impact_of_Teacher-Student_Interaction_on_Student_ Motivation_and_Achievement

Raymond E, Atsumbe B, Okwori R, Jebba AM. Comparative Effects of the Synchronous and the Asynchronous Instructional Approaches Concerning the Students’ Achievements and Interests in Electrical Engineering at the Niger State College of Education. Int J Eng Pedagog. 2016;6(3):4.

Raymond A, Jacob E, Jacob D, Lyons J. Peer learning a pedagogical approach to enhance online learning: A qualitative exploration. Nurse Educ Today. 2016;44:165–9.

Dixson MD. Measuring student engagement in the online course: the Online Student Engagement scale (OSE). Online Learn J. 2015;19(4): 143.

Carini RM, Kuh GD, Klein SP. Student engagement and student learning: Testing the linkages. Res High Educ. 2006;47(1):1–32.

Rimm-Kaufman, Sandilos S. Improving students relationships with teachers to provide essential supports for learning [Internet]. American Psychological Association. 2012. Available from: https://www.apa.org/education/k12/relationships?item=1#.

Downloads

Published

2023-07-31

How to Cite

Sugiharto, F., Hara Permana, R., & Hermayanti, Y. (2023). Student Engagement in Online Learning Among Undergraduate Nursing Students . Jurnal Keperawatan Komprehensif (Comprehensive Nursing Journal), 9(3). https://doi.org/10.33755/jkk.v9i3.509