Acceptance of Mini-CEX Use with Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) Theoritical Approach

Hikmat Pramajati; Nunung Siti Sukaesih; Emi Lindayani; Halimatusyadiah

doi:10.33755/jkk.v8i1.299

Authors

Hikmat Pramajati Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Nunung Siti Sukaesih Nunung Siti Sukaesih
Emi Lindayani Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Halimatusyadiah Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kesehatan Budi Luhur Cimahi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33755/jkk.v8i1.299

Keywords:

clinical learning, mini-CEX, Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)

Abstract

Aim: Obtain an overview of the level of acceptance of nursing clinic educators using mini-CEX as an assessment method.

Method: This research is a descriptive study with 62 subjects were clinical instructors, conducted training first, then the technique of data collection using 2 instruments namely mini-CEX format and modified TAM.

Result: 98.4% of respondents can use mini-CEX with graduation criteria above 75% and the graduation of 18.6. Product moment correlation test results for all items TAM significance value> 0.25, then all items are declared valid with a significance of 95%. TAM questionnaire reliability with Alpha Croanbach's test is 0.957. The results of data analysis using the t-test with a limit on the acceptance value of using mini-CEX using the TAM questionnaire was 70% found that the test results showed sig 0,000 (<.0.05).

Conclusion: Mini-CEX can be used as a clinical performance appraisal instrument for nursing students, with a high level of acceptance measured by TAM.

References

Chan DSK. Validation of the clinical learning environment inventory. Western Journal of Nursing Research. 2003.

Bigdeli S, Pakpour V, Aalaa M, Shekarabi R. Clinical learning environments ( actual and expected ): perceptions of Iran University of Medical Sciences nursing students. 2015;

MW S, HK N, N H. Student experiences in learning person-centred care of patients with Alzheimer’s disease as perceived by nursing students and supervising nurses. J Clin Nurs. 2010;

Hengameh H, Afsaneh R, Morteza K, Hosein M, Marjan SM, Ebadi A. The Effect of Applying Direct Observation of Procedural Skills ( DOPS ) on Nursing Students ’ Clinical Skills : A Randomized Clinical. 2015;7(7):17–21.

Asosiasi Institusi Pendidikan Vokasi Perawat Indonesia. Kurikulum Diploma III Keperawatan Indonesia. Indonesia; 2014.

D’Souza MS, Karkada SN, Parahoo K, Venkatesaperumal R. Perception of and satisfaction with the clinical learning environment among nursing students. Nurse Educ Today. 2015;

Steven A, Magnusson C, Smith P, Pearson PH. Patient safety in nursing education: Contexts, tensions and feeling safe to learn. Nurse Educ Today. 2014;

Hejri SM, Jalili M, Shirazi M, Masoomi R, Nedjat S, Norcini J. The utility of mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise ( mini-CEX ) in undergraduate and postgraduate medical education : protocol for a systematic review. 2017;1–8.

Franko DL, Cousineau TM, Trant M, Green TC, Rancourt D, Thompson D, et al. Motivation, self-efficacy, physical activity and nutrition in college students: Randomized controlled trial of an internet-based education program. Prev Med (Baltim). 2008;

Nursalam. Manajemen Keperawatan. Isbn : 978-602-8570-73-2. 2011.

Gordon J. ABC of learning and teaching in medicine: One to one teaching and feedback. BMJ. 2003;

Hall WA. Developing clinical placements in times of scarcity. Nurse Educ Today. 2006;