Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

The scope of this journal includes, but is not limited to the research results of:

Fundamentals of Nursing
Management in Nursing
Medical-surgical Nursing
Critical Care Nursing
Emergency and Trauma Nursing
Oncology Nursing
Community Health Nursing
Occupational Health Nursing
Mental Health Nursing
Holistic Nursing
Geriatric Nursing
Family Nursing
Maternity Nursing
Women's Health Nursing
Pediatric Nursing
Education in Nursing
Nursing Policies
Legal Nursing
Advanced Practice Nursing
Nursing Informatics

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

In the reviewing process, there are at least two reviewers for each manuscript for the related topic. Judgement from the first reviewer will be the main priority on which the editor will make their decision, if there are only two reviewers. Three weeks will be needed for reviewer to complete one round of the reviewing process.

Generally, the candidate of the reviewers will be chosen based on their reputation in the international publication number and the study quality. For the next step, the editor sends an invitation letter to each candidate of the reviewer. After the candidate of the reviewer has been informed of their availability for the reviewing process, the editor can create an account for each reviewer and then send manuscript by OJS.

All of the reviewing process is done by way of a blind review and is managed by the editor in OJS.

 

Publication Frequency

JKK published twice a years: January and July

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

This journal is open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to users or / institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to full text articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or author. This is in accordance with Budapest Open Access Initiative

 

Plagiarism Checker

All paper submitted tto our journal will be checked for plagisrisme using  software grammarly premium

 

Publication Ethics

This journal follows guidelines from Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) in facing all aspects of publication ethics and, in particular, how to handle cases of research and publication misconduct. All articles in this journal involving human subjects should respect principles of research ethics as described in Declaration of Helsinki and studies involving animals should obey the International Guiding Principles for Biomedical Research as developed by the Council for International Organization of Medical Sciences (CIOMS).

Jurnal Keperawatan Komprehensif adapts COPE to meet high quality standard of ethics for publisher, editors, authors, and reviewers. As an essential issue, publication ethics needs to be explained clearly to improve the quality of the research worldwide. In this part, we explain the standard for editors, authors, and reviewers. In addition, publisher don’t have right to interfere with the integrity of the contents and only support to publish in timely manner.

For Editors

  1. Editors should be responsible for every articles published in Jurnal Keperawatan Komprehensif
  2. The editors may communicate with other editors or reviewers in making the final decision.
  3. An editor has to evaluate the article objectively for publication, judging each on its quality without looking to nationality, ethnicity, political beliefs, race, religion, gender, seniority, or institutional affiliation of the authors. He/she should decline his/her assignment when there is a potential of conflict of interest.
  4. Editors need to ensure the document sent to the reviewer does not contain the information of the author, vice versa.
  5. Editors’ decision should be informed to authors accompanied by reviewers’ comments unless they contain offensive or libelous remarks.
  6. Editors should respect requests from authors that an individual should not review the submission, if these are well-reasoned and practicable.
  7. Editors and all staffs should guarantee the confidentiality of the submitted article.
  8. Editors will be guided by COPE flowcharts if there is a suspected misconduct or disputed authorship.

For Reviewers

  1. Reviewers need to comment on ethical questions and possible research and publication misconduct.
  2. Reviewers will do the work in timely manner and should notify editor if they can’t complete the work.
  3. Reviewers need to keep the confidentiality of the article.
  4. Reviewers should not accept to review the article in which there is potential conflict of interest between them and any of the authors.

 

 

For Authors

  1. Author(s) affirm that the material has not been previously published and that they have not trans­ferred elsewhere any rights to the article.
  2. Author(s) should ensure the originality of the work and they have properly cited others’ work in accordance of the references format.
  3. Author(s) should not engage in plagiarism nor self-plagiarism.
  4. The author(s) have not suggested any personal information that may make the identity of the patient recognizable in any forms of description part, photograph or pedigree. When the photographs of the patient were essential and indispensable as scientific information, the author(s) have received the consent in written form and have clearly stated it.
  5. In case of experimenting on human, the authors have certified that the process of the research is in accordance with ethical standards of Helsinki declaration, domestic and foreign committees that preside over human experi­ment. If any doubts are raised whether the research was proceeded in accordance with the declaration, the authors should explain it. In case of experimenting on animals, the authors have certified that the authors had followed the domestic and foreign guideline related to experiment of animals in a laboratory.
  6. Author(s) should give the editor the data and details of the work, if there are suspicions of data falsification or fabrication.

Authors of the journal should clarify everything that may cause conflict of interests such as work, research expenses, and consul­tant expenses.

 

Reference Manager

All paper submitted to our journal should be used Mendley for reference manager

 

License

Jurnal Keperawatan Komprehensif have CC-BY or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.